W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > January 2006

Re: The URI of a RDDL "nature"

From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 18:05:40 -0500
Message-Id: <26D25943-6359-4462-9E35-BAEA1B20FD93@openhealth.org>
Cc: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>, <www-tag@w3.org>
To: "Williams, Stuart ((HP Labs, Bristol))" <skw@hp.com>
> ... Once could of course the
> dereference the nature term to find more (machine/human) readable
> documentation about that nature (maybe in another namespace document
> :-).

Right. For example I've subdivided the http://www.rddl.org/natures/  
document to define natures of specifications:


is such a document that contains descriptions of rddl:natures such as:


also note the use of rddl:purpose="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/ 
owl#subClassOf" to define natures that are subclasses of other  
natures. (this is intended to be an example of integrating RDDL  
natures and purposes with OWL ontologies, much along the lines of  
Norm's ontology)


Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2006 23:11:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:10 UTC