- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:27:32 -0500
- To: Vincent.Quint@inrialpes.fr
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
I just saw in the meeting agenda: > 2. Preparing agenda for Dec. f2f at MIT[13] > > Collect topics and issues to be discussed during the f2f Here are a few I'd suggest we consider scheduling (in no particular order): * Followup to Edinburgh discussions of versioning: we seemed to be off to a useful if somewhat slow start in settling terminology, etc., and I think there was some sense that versioning-related work could be a key theme for the TAG's work in the coming year or two. * Self-describing documents: I don't think we have an issue around this, but Tim at least informally seemed to feel it would be worth attention. I agree, and I might be convinced to do some work on a finding (though we'll have to set priorities relative to TAG commitments already made). * schemeProtocols-49: I owe the TAG a reworked position to be available within the next few weeks, allowing time for TAG members to read and consider before the F2F. I think a couple of hours on this would be worthwhile. The goal would be either to finally agree that there's something worth pursuing, or to formally put it aside for the forseeable future. * Web Services and the Web: I think we're using endPointRefs-47 as an excuse for the TAG to come up to speed on Web Services and perhaps to discover new issues worth pursuing. Henry's worked example seems useful. I think this is a good use of the TAG's time. I presume we should also spend a bit of time on F2F scheduling, thinking about the impact of the upcoming election (e.g. need to reassign issues owned by those who will be leaving), and other logistics. Noah -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 --------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2005 17:27:44 UTC