- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:27:41 +0000
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: "Felix Sasaki" <fsasaki@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
[If this is the same as Jon Hanna's point, then just consider it a
"+1" to his posting]
Bjoern Hoehrmann writes:
> [1] Unless you'd try to argue that text processing occurs only at e.g.
> some octets-to-Infoset level and IRI-to-URI processing is thus not
> constrained by C014, or if you argue that the requirement does not
> apply to XML at all, because it's all read into a DOM and thus all
> text is in a Unicode-encoding before IRI-to-URI processing can
> occur.
Precisely. IRI-to-URI processing for XML is only coherently
understood as a process that is defined in the terms provided by the
Infoset spec., where _all_ values are sequences of Unicode code
points.
It follows that no contradiction with the Processing Model, which
applies at data model construction time for implementations, is
possible.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDnvZ9kjnJixAXWBoRApTmAJ9TFPKWkgc3ECt90kOKm/a449KYoQCcD3rX
EGqepu9B8LW7+Zd6IjyjI34=
=TLRN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 13 December 2005 16:27:51 UTC