Re: [schemeProtocols-49] New draft of proposed "URI Schemes and Web Protocols" Finding


On 12/4/05, Dan Connolly <> wrote:
> I think that's a little too strong. Here's a rule that I think I
> subscribe to:
>   If you can access a resource via HTTP, then it has a name that starts
> with http:

Did you perhaps mean "then it *can* have a name that starts with http:"?
Because I disagree with what you wrote there, as HTTP's request-line can
accept any URI, not just http URIs.

In addition, "can access" is also somewhat subjective, as some resources
can't be interacted with at "full fidelity" via HTTP, e.g. telnet sessions.


Received on Sunday, 4 December 2005 20:29:26 UTC