Another URI scheme . . .

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Further to our discussions about xri and the general matter of new URI
schemes which overlap substantially with http:

  http://www.niso.org/news/releases/pr-InfoURI-11-05.html

What do we have to do to get the IETF to at least give us a heads-up
when a decision like this is coming. . . ?

Or perhaps this happened, either to the URI list or via the IETF
liaison, and W3C dropped the ball?  Indeed I see an announcement of a
new draft from July 2004 on the URI list [1], but no followup at all
there :-(.

Too late now.

ht

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2004Jul/0020
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDkaMIkjnJixAXWBoRAgovAJ9X72EeZzcj+jOup4WEEkdzTy15ngCfZSvz
UgrLD3OzcMJLGdzzYH9xmZA=
=IaMb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Saturday, 3 December 2005 13:52:14 UTC