RE: Agenda of 12 April TAG teleconference

> DanC to review Functions and Operators insofar as its a URI standard
> library [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-tagmem-minutes.html#action02]

This has been recorded in the QT Last Call Bugzilla database as:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1243

The notification of this entry was sent to the comments list:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2005Apr/0081.html


/paulc

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 
17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 
mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com

  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of
> Dan Connolly
> Sent: April 11, 2005 11:05 PM
> To: Vincent.Quint@inrialpes.fr
> Cc: www-tag@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Agenda of 12 April TAG teleconference
> 
> 
> On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 19:22 +0200, Vincent Quint wrote:
> >    http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2005/04/12-agenda.html
> [...]
> >        1. Roll call -- Regrets: Noah -- Scribe: DavidO
> >           Accept this agenda?
> 
> >        2. Educational Material
> >           ACTION DanC to add a webarch link, spell check and the
like,
> and
> >           announce "educational materials are welcome" to www-tag
> 
> I did some spell checking and added a link to webarch, but I didn't
> make an announcement.
>  http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/em27
>   $Revision: 1.5 $ of $Date: 2005/04/04 19:11:09 $
> 
> I'm happy to continue that action without discussion.
> 
> On the other hand, I would like to discuss this one:
> 
> 
> progress:
> 
> fn:escape-uri needs to be invertible in the true() case; take out the
%
> exception Dan Connolly (Friday, 8 April)
>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2005Apr/0057.html
> 
> 
> >        3. Review of XRI documents
> >           mail[13] from Henry, mail[14] from XRI Committe chairs
> >           ACTION Ed to review XRI and provide comments [recorded in
> >
http://www.w3.org/2005/03/22-tagmem-minutes.html#action02[15]]
> >        4. Review of Binary XML documents
> >           Thread[16] on www-tag
> >           ACTION Ed and Norm to review XML Binary Characterization
use
> cases
> >           document. [recorded in
> >           http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2005Mar/att-
> 0056/March152005.html#action02[17]]
> >           ACTION HT to review the XBC documents with help from Noah
> [recorded
> >           in http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2005/02/28-
> minutes.html#action09[18]]
> >        5. New issue?
> >           Squatting on link relationship names, x-tokens,
registries,
> and
> >           URI-based extensibility
> >           email[19] from Dan
> >        6. Close issue xmlIDSemantics-32?
> >           See Norm's comment in the minutes of 7 Feb telcon[20]
> >        7. abstractComponentRefs-37: HT volunteer to take this
finding on
> >           See the minutes of 22 Feb telcon[21]
> >        8. Discussion of httpRange-14
> >           Continue discussion from 29 March[22]
> 
> --
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
>

Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2005 20:35:24 UTC