Re: 10 May 2004 Editor's Draft of Architecture Document - reviewer responses requested from Ian B. Jacobs on 2004-05-11 (www-tag@w3.org from May 2004)

From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 11:28:10 -0400
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: T.Hammond@elsevier.com, elharo@metalab.unc.edu, dmkarr@earthlink.net, bob.ducharme@lexisnexis.com, dbooth@w3.org, tjg@star.le.ac.uk, patrick.stickler@nokia.com, sandro@w3.org, dom@w3.org, djw@w3.org, jacek.kopecky@systinet.com, duerst@w3.org, stephane@w3.org, kendall@monkeyfist.com, klaskey@mitre.org, Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@ieee.org>, lesch@w3.org, cmsmcq@w3.org, bparsia@isr.umd.edu, gk@ninebynine.org, public-webarch-comments@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <1084289289.10472.21.camel@seabright>

On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 09:42, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> I would feel much happier with this draft if some of the fundamental
> issues that Pat Hayes has pointed out had been addressed.  Without
> resolution of these issues I don't see any point in the document.

Hi Peter,

I, too, would be happy if the document addressed everyone's issues!
I cannot imagine getting there other than by increments. This draft
takes into account what the TAG has discussed thus far, and then
some. I look forward to ongoing improvement.

 _ Ian

-- 
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447

Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2004 11:28:19 UTC