- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 09:42:11 -0400 (EDT)
- To: ij@w3.org
- Cc: T.Hammond@elsevier.com, elharo@metalab.unc.edu, dmkarr@earthlink.net, bob.ducharme@lexisnexis.com, dbooth@w3.org, tjg@star.le.ac.uk, patrick.stickler@nokia.com, sandro@w3.org, dom@w3.org, djw@w3.org, jacek.kopecky@systinet.com, duerst@w3.org, stephane@w3.org, kendall@monkeyfist.com, klaskey@mitre.org, Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org, lesch@w3.org, cmsmcq@w3.org, bparsia@isr.umd.edu, gk@ninebynine.org, public-webarch-comments@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org
I would feel much happier with this draft if some of the fundamental issues that Pat Hayes has pointed out had been addressed. Without resolution of these issues I don't see any point in the document. As a particular illustrative example that leapt out at me while I was reading the document, I quote, from Section 1 Each resource is identified by a URI. and from Section 2 Resources exist before URIs; a resource may be identified by zero URIs. Peter F. Patel-Schneider From: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org> Subject: 10 May 2004 Editor's Draft of Architecture Document - reviewer responses requested Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 21:31:51 -0400 > Hello, > > In preparation for the TAG's face-to-face meeting this week, I've > made available the 10 May 2004 Editor's Draft of the Architecture > Document: > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/webarch-20040510/ > > This draft supersedes the 7 May draft; I incorporated a few extra > changes I had wanted to make based on TAG resolutions. > > The remainder of this email includes information about: > > 1) Diff resources > 2) List of issues addressed > > Below there is a list of names and issue URIs. If your name is > on the list (and in the "To" line above), it means that this > draft MAY address the issues that you raised that are listed > below. Each issue URI points to details of the proposal to > address your issue. > > Although the TAG has not yet agreed to these proposals, > I welcome your comments about proposals that concern your > issues; please send those comments to public-webarch-comments@w3.org. In > particular, please indicate whether the text as proposed satisfies you > for that issue or > how it might be edited to satisfy you. > > Thank you, > > - Ian
Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2004 09:45:05 UTC