- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 08:05:11 -0600
- To: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 17:12, Jonathan Borden wrote: > On Jan 15, 2004, at 11:46 PM, Dan Connolly wrote: > > > > > > > > In sum, I like rddl4 but for > > 1. Some pending edits we've discussed: > > - a hello-world example > > the spec itself has traditionally served as a "hello world" example ... Does it say so in the prose? I realized that the spec was an example pretty late in the game. Even so, it's not very easy to find the relevant bits of markup if you have to hunt thru the markup of the whole spec. Besides... that doesn't work very well if you want to print the thing. > I've place resources for a DTD and RELAXNG schema as well as a > reference to your XSLT in a new spec that I've modified from Tim > Bray's. The new location, for the moment, is > > http://www.rddl.org/rddl2 I'll take a look presently... > > - DTD foo > > done. > > > - a MIME type registration > > > > 2. a normative mapping to RDF, for which I propose > > grokRDDL.xsl (with the "this namespace" kludge > > fixed) as a reference implementation > > > > > > I've included a reference to this in the document at the above URI. The > way the nature and purpose are handled (the nature is "XSLT", the > purpose is the *output* format) I saw that... it doesn't mesh well with using RDDL purposes as RDF properties. Hmm... Nary relationships are often awkward... http://esw.w3.org/topic/NaryRelations > should allow programs to use the RDDL > to chain transforms in order to obtain a desired format -- if this is > actually useful. e.g. suppose you have XSLTs for converting formats A > -> B and B -> C, using the RDDLs for A, B, C a program could derive a > two stage transform of A -> C. > > Jonathan -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 19 January 2004 09:05:51 UTC