- From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 18:12:18 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
On Jan 15, 2004, at 11:46 PM, Dan Connolly wrote: > > > > In sum, I like rddl4 but for > 1. Some pending edits we've discussed: > - a hello-world example the spec itself has traditionally served as a "hello world" example ... I've place resources for a DTD and RELAXNG schema as well as a reference to your XSLT in a new spec that I've modified from Tim Bray's. The new location, for the moment, is http://www.rddl.org/rddl2 > - DTD foo done. > - a MIME type registration > > 2. a normative mapping to RDF, for which I propose > grokRDDL.xsl (with the "this namespace" kludge > fixed) as a reference implementation > > I've included a reference to this in the document at the above URI. The way the nature and purpose are handled (the nature is "XSLT", the purpose is the *output* format) should allow programs to use the RDDL to chain transforms in order to obtain a desired format -- if this is actually useful. e.g. suppose you have XSLTs for converting formats A -> B and B -> C, using the RDDLs for A, B, C a program could derive a two stage transform of A -> C. Jonathan
Received on Sunday, 18 January 2004 18:12:26 UTC