- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 17:07:43 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
- Message-Id: <1082063262.1179.5.camel@seabright>
Hello,
The agenda for the TAG's 19 April 2004 teleconf is
available as HTML [1] and as text below.
_ Ian
[1] http://www.w3.org/2004/04/19-tag.html
==================================================
Agenda for 19 April 2004 TAG teleconference
1. Administrative (30min)
1. Roll call. Regrets: SW. Chair: NW
2. Proposed to accept the minutes of the [7]29 Mar teleconference
Completed Action IJ 2004/03/29: Remove a side comment per SW's
suggestion in 22 March minutes.
3. Accept this [8]agenda?
4. Next meeting: 26 April?
[7] http://www.w3.org/2004/03/29-tag-summary.html
[8] http://www.w3.org/2004/04/19-tag.html
1.1 May TAG ftf meeting in Boston
1. See [9]meeting page
2. Action IJ 2004/03/29: Look for more advice from W3C Team on
suggested hotels ([10]Done)
[9] http://www.w3.org/2004/05/12-tag-mtg.html
[10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2004Mar/0090.html
1.2 May AC meeting in New York
1. [11]Registration[12], Agenda
2. [13]Draft TAG report to AC, from SW
3. Presentation (17 May, 16:30, for 45 minutes including discussion)
1. Topics?
1. Flavor of LC comments? Biggest issues?
2. Presenters?
[11] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/34257/NY04/
[12] http://www.w3.org/2004/05/16-AC-agenda.html
[13] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/04/13-Draft-AC-Report
1.3 Revised TAG Charter (10-15 minutes MAXIMUM)
* Action PC/IJ: Proposed revised [14]TAG charter ([15]Proposed)
* Get AC Rep input?
[14] http://www.w3.org/2001/07/19-tag
[15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2004Apr/0012.html
2. Technical (60min)
See also [16]open actions by owner and [17]open issues.
[16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/actions_owner.html
[17] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html?view=normal&closed=1
2.1 Top Level Domains used as filters (.xxx, .mobile, etc.)
1. Action CL 2004/03/29: Send a draft to www-tag explaining why the
.mobile proposal is misinformed. If the TAG supports the proposal,
send to ICANN on the official mailing list.
2. Action IJ 2004/03/29: Talk to DJW about sending a proposal to the
TAG (focusing on social issues) that the TAG could review and
possibly endorse. Progress; I chatted with DJW. We are working on
a position statement.
2.2 Web Architecture Document Last Call
Resources:
1. [18]Last Call issues list ([19]sorted by section)
2. [20]Annotated version of WebArch
3. Archive of [21]public-webarch-comments
4. [22]List of actions by TAG participant
5. Additional actions
1. Action IJ 2004/02/09: Incorporate editorial suggestions (see
minutes of that meeting for details).
[18] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/issues.html
[19] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/concerning.html
[20] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/webarchWithIssues.html
[21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/
[22] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/actions_owner.html
Actions 2004/03/15 (due 25 March?) to review sections:
* Norm: I volunteer for section 3 ([23]Proposed)
* TBL: I volunteer 2 hours starting at start of section 2
* Roy: I volunteer to look at section 2
* Stuart: I volunteer starting at section 2.3
* Mario: I will look at section 4
[23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Apr/0011.html
_________________________________________________________________
The TAG does not expect to discuss issues below this line.
3. Status report on these findings
See also [24]TAG findings
* [25]abstractComponentRefs-37:
+ 30 Oct 2003 draft finding "[26]Abstract Component References"
* [27]contentPresentation-26:
+ 30 June 2003 draft finding "[28]Separation of semantic and
presentational markup, to the extent possible, is
architecturally sound"
* [29]metadataInURI-31
* [30]siteData-36
+ "[31]There is no such thing as a Web site"
[24] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
[25] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#abstractComponentRefs-37
[26] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/abstractComponentRefs-20031030
[27] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentPresentation-26
[28] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/contentPresentation-26-20030630.html
[29] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#metadataInURI-31
[30] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#siteData-36
[31] http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/01/08/WebSite36
4. Other action items
* Action RF 2003/10/08: Explain "identifies" in RFC 2396.
* Action DC 2003/11/15: Follow up on KeepPOSTRecords with Janet Daly
on how to raise awareness of this point (which is in CUAP).
* Action CL 2003/10/27: Draft XML mime type thingy with Murata-san
_________________________________________________________________
Ian Jacobs for Stuart Williams and TimBL
Last modified: $Date: 2004/04/15 21:05:08 $
W3C | [1]TAG | Previous: [2]29 Mar teleconference | Next: 26 April
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2004/03/29-tag-summary.html
Agenda for 19 April 2004 TAG teleconference
Nearby: [3]Teleconference details · [4]issues list ([5]handling new
issues)· [6]www-tag archive
[3] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/#remote
[4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html
[5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Jul/0054.html
[6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/
1. Administrative (30min)
1. Roll call. Regrets: SW. Chair: NW
2. Proposed to accept the minutes of the [7]29 Mar teleconference
Completed Action IJ 2004/03/29: Remove a side comment per SW's
suggestion in 22 March minutes.
3. Accept this [8]agenda?
4. Next meeting: 26 April?
[7] http://www.w3.org/2004/03/29-tag-summary.html
[8] http://www.w3.org/2004/04/19-tag.html
1.1 May TAG ftf meeting in Boston
1. See [9]meeting page
2. Action IJ 2004/03/29: Look for more advice from W3C Team on
suggested hotels ([10]Done)
[9] http://www.w3.org/2004/05/12-tag-mtg.html
[10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2004Mar/0090.html
1.2 May AC meeting in New York
1. [11]Registration[12], Agenda
2. [13]Draft TAG report to AC, from SW
3. Presentation (17 May, 16:30, for 45 minutes including discussion)
1. Topics?
1. Flavor of LC comments? Biggest issues?
2. Presenters?
[11] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/34257/NY04/
[12] http://www.w3.org/2004/05/16-AC-agenda.html
[13] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/04/13-Draft-AC-Report
1.3 Revised TAG Charter (10-15 minutes MAXIMUM)
* Action PC/IJ: Proposed revised [14]TAG charter ([15]Proposed)
* Get AC Rep input?
[14] http://www.w3.org/2001/07/19-tag
[15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2004Apr/0012.html
2. Technical (60min)
See also [16]open actions by owner and [17]open issues.
[16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/actions_owner.html
[17] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html?view=normal&closed=1
2.1 Top Level Domains used as filters (.xxx, .mobile, etc.)
1. Action CL 2004/03/29: Send a draft to www-tag explaining why the
.mobile proposal is misinformed. If the TAG supports the proposal,
send to ICANN on the official mailing list.
2. Action IJ 2004/03/29: Talk to DJW about sending a proposal to the
TAG (focusing on social issues) that the TAG could review and
possibly endorse. Progress; I chatted with DJW. We are working on
a position statement.
2.2 Web Architecture Document Last Call
Resources:
1. [18]Last Call issues list ([19]sorted by section)
2. [20]Annotated version of WebArch
3. Archive of [21]public-webarch-comments
4. [22]List of actions by TAG participant
5. Additional actions
1. Action IJ 2004/02/09: Incorporate editorial suggestions (see
minutes of that meeting for details).
[18] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/issues.html
[19] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/concerning.html
[20] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/webarchWithIssues.html
[21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/
[22] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/actions_owner.html
Actions 2004/03/15 (due 25 March?) to review sections:
* Norm: I volunteer for section 3 ([23]Proposed)
* TBL: I volunteer 2 hours starting at start of section 2
* Roy: I volunteer to look at section 2
* Stuart: I volunteer starting at section 2.3
* Mario: I will look at section 4
[23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Apr/0011.html
_________________________________________________________________
The TAG does not expect to discuss issues below this line.
3. Status report on these findings
See also [24]TAG findings
* [25]abstractComponentRefs-37:
+ 30 Oct 2003 draft finding "[26]Abstract Component References"
* [27]contentPresentation-26:
+ 30 June 2003 draft finding "[28]Separation of semantic and
presentational markup, to the extent possible, is
architecturally sound"
* [29]metadataInURI-31
* [30]siteData-36
+ "[31]There is no such thing as a Web site"
[24] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
[25] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#abstractComponentRefs-37
[26] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/abstractComponentRefs-20031030
[27] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentPresentation-26
[28] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/contentPresentation-26-20030630.html
[29] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#metadataInURI-31
[30] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#siteData-36
[31] http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/01/08/WebSite36
4. Other action items
* Action RF 2003/10/08: Explain "identifies" in RFC 2396.
* Action DC 2003/11/15: Follow up on KeepPOSTRecords with Janet Daly
on how to raise awareness of this point (which is in CUAP).
* Action CL 2003/10/27: Draft XML mime type thingy with Murata-san
_________________________________________________________________
Ian Jacobs for Stuart Williams and TimBL
Last modified: $Date: 2004/04/15 21:05:08 $
--
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2004 17:07:46 UTC