- From: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:17:46 -0700
- To: "Tim Bray" <tbray@textuality.com>, <www-tag@w3.org>
Interesting, so you are basically arguing against things like the HTML and XML DOM? How will this be rationalized by the W3C? ________________________________ From: www-tag-request@w3.org on behalf of Tim Bray Sent: Tue 10/21/2003 6:26 PM To: www-tag@w3.org Subject: Action item on syntax-based interoperability Here it is: The Web is distinguished from many other information systems in that its important interfaces are defined, not in terms of APIs or data structures or object models, but in terms of syntax, by specifying the content and sequence of the messages interchanged. It commonly occurs that programmers working with the Web write code directly to generate and parse these messages. Even more unusually, it is not uncommon for end-users to have direct exposure to these messages. This leads to the well-known "view source" effect, whereby users gain expertise in the workings of the systems by direct exposure to the underlying protocols. The general success of Web software is evidence that interoperability in networked information systems is best achieved by specifying interfaces at the level of concrete syntax rather than abstract data models or APIs. Cheers, Tim Bray http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2003 15:21:32 UTC