- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: 08 May 2003 09:34:50 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Hello,
The agenda of the 12 May 2003 TAG teleconf is available
as HTML [1] and as text below. We will be meeting
with the Voice Browser WG starting at 15:45 ET to discuss
issue contentTypeOverride-24.
- Ian
[1] http://www.w3.org/2003/05/12-tag.html
==========================================================
Agenda for 12 May 2003 TAG teleconference
Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change after close of
business (Boston time) Thursday of this week.
1. Administrative (45min)
1. Confirm Chair (SW), Scribe (IJ). Possible regrets: DO
2. Accept [7]5 May teleconference minutes?
3. Accept this [8]agenda?
4. Next meeting: 26 May?
[7] http://www.w3.org/2003/05/05-tag-summary.html
[8] http://www.w3.org/2003/05/05-tag.html
1.1 Meeting planning
* TAG virtual meetings 2 and 19 June (no meeting 16 June). See
[9]comments from Stuart.
* Agenda?
[9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003May/0009.html
1.2 W3C Track Presentation
* Action PC 2003/04/14: Propose TAG's [10]WWW2003 track report to
TAG.
[10] http://www2003.org/t_www.htm
1.3 TAG report at AC meeting
1. [11]Suggestions for TAG presentation at May AC Meeting from DO and
PC
2. Action DO, CL: Present TAG's AC meeting report to TAG.
[11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Apr/0027.html
2. Technical (45min)
2.1 Issues the TAG intends to discuss
The TAG and Voice Browser Working Group are meeting this week to
discuss this issue.
* [12]contentTypeOverride-24
+ See finding "[13]Client handling of MIME headers"
+ Completed action IJ: Send email to the Voice Browser WG
+ [14]Speech Recognition Grammar Specification Version 1.0,
section [15]2.2.2 External Reference by URI
[12] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentTypeOverride-24
[13] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mime-respect.html
[14] http://www.w3.org/TR/speech-grammar/
[15] http://www.w3.org/TR/speech-grammar/#S2.2.2
2.2 Architecture document
No discussion this week.
See also: [16]findings.
1. [17]26 Mar 2003 Working Draft of Arch Doc:
1. Action DC 2003/01/27: write two pages on correct and
incorrect application of REST to an actual web page design
2. Action DO 2003/01/27: Please send writings regarding Web
services to tag@w3.org. DO grants DC license to cut and paste
and put into DC writing.
3. Action DC 2003/03/17: : Write some text for interactions
chapter of arch doc related to [18]message passing, a dual of
shared state.
[16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
[17] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-webarch-20030326/
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Mar/0018.html
2.3 Issues that have associated action items
* [19]whenToUseGet-7
+ Action IJ 2003/05/05: Solicit review of [20]revised draft
finding, after taking into account comments from DC.
* [21]uriMediaType-9
+ IANA appears to have responded to the spirit of this draft
(see [22]email from Chris Lilley).What's required to close
this issue?
+ Action CL 2003/05/05: Propose CL's three changes to
registration process to Ned Freed. [What forum?]
* [23]abstractComponentRefs-37
+ See [24]issue description from David Orchard
+ Next steps?
* [25]namespaceDocument-8
+ Action TB 2003/04/07: Prepare RDDL Note. Include in status
section that there is TAG consensus that RDDL is a suitable
format for representations of an XML namespace. Clean up
messy section 4 of RDDL draft and investigate and publish a
canonical mapping to RDF.
+ Action PC 2003/04/07: Prepare finding to answer this issue,
pointing to the RDDL Note. See [26]comments from Paul
regarding TB theses.
+ Action TB 2003/04/28: Draft a TAG opinion on the use of URNs
for namespace names, for review by the TAG
o RF: Folks assume that because the specs say so, URNs
will be persisitent. But persistence is a function of
institutional commitment and frequency of use.
* [27]xlinkScope-23
+ Status report?
+ See [28]draft, and [29]SW message to CG chairs.
* [30]IRIEverywhere-27
+ Completed action TB 2003/04/14: Draft a proposed step forward
on IRI 27. ([31]Done). In that [32]email, TB proposes to
close this issue.
+ Action CL 2003/04/07: Revised position statement on use of
IRIs. CL says to expect this by 21 April.
+ Action TBL 2003/04/28: Explain how existing specifications
that handle IRIs are inconsistent. (Action unclear from 28
Apr minutes).
* [33]URIEquivalence-15
+ SW proposal: Track RFC2396bis where [34]Tim Bray text has
been integrated. Comment within the IETF process. Move this
issue to pending state.
* [35]xmlIDSemantics-32
+ See [36]Chris Lilley draft finding.
Action NW 2003/05/05: Point Core WG to CL finding once made
public.
* [37]siteData-36
+ Action TBL 2003/02/24 : Summarize siteData-36
* [38]xmlFunctions-34
+ Action TBL 2003/02/06: State the issue with a reference to
XML Core work. See [39]email from TimBL capturing some of the
issues.
* [40]binaryXML-30
+ Action TB 2003/02/17: Write to www-tag with his thoughts on
adding to survey.
+ Next steps to finding? See [41]summary from Chris.
* [42]contentPresentation-26
+ Action CL 2003/02/06: Create a draft finding in this space.
Due 3 March.
* [43]rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
+ Action DC 2003/02/06: Propose TAG response to XML Schema
desideratum ([44]RQ-23).
* [45]HTTPSubstrate-16
+ Action RF 2003/02/06: Write a response to IESG asking whether
the Web services example in the SOAP 1.2 primer is intended
to be excluded from RFC 3205
+ See [46]message from Larry Masinter w.r.t. Web services.
* [47]errorHandling-20
+ Action CL 2003/02/06: Write a draft finding on the topic of
(1) early/late detection of errors (2) late/early binding (3)
robustness (4) definition of errors (5) recovery once error
has been signaled. Due first week of March.
* [48]metadataInURI-31
+ Action SW 2003/02/06: Draft finding for this one.
+ See also [49]TB email on Apple Music Store and use of URI
schemes instead of headers
* [50]fragmentInXML-28 : Use of fragment identifiers in XML.
1. Connection to content negotiation?
2. Connection to opacity of URIs?
3. No actions associated / no owner.
[19] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#whenToUseGet-7
[20] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/get7-20020610.html
[21] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#uriMediaType-9
[22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0302.html
[23] http://www.w3.org/2003/05/24-tag-summary.html#abstractComponentRefs-37
[24] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Apr/0089.html
[25] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#namespaceDocument-8
[26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Apr/0046.html
[27] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#xlinkScope-23
[28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0094.html
[29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0104
[30] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#IRIEverywhere-27
[31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Apr/0090.html
[32] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Apr/0090.html
[33] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#URIEquivalence-15
[34] http://www.textuality.com/tag/uri-comp-4
[35] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xmlIDSemantics-32
[36] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/xmlIDSemantics-32.html
[37] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#siteData-36
[38] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xmlFunctions-34
[39] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0309.html
[40] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#binaryXML-30
[41] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0224.html
[42] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentPresentation-26
[43] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
[44] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xmlschema-11-req-20030121/#N400183
[45] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#HTTPSubstrate-16
[46] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0208.html
[47] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#errorHandling-20
[48] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#metadataInURI-31
[49] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Apr/0151.html
[50] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#fragmentInXML-28
3. Other actions
* Action IJ 2003/02/06: Modify issues list to show that
actions/pending are orthogonal to decisions. IJ and PLH making
substantial progress on this; hope to have something to show in
May.
_________________________________________________________________
Ian Jacobs for Stuart Williams and TimBL
Last modified: $Date: 2003/05/08 13:20:30 $
--
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2003 09:34:56 UTC