Re: Draft TAG finding available: Client handling of MIME headers

Julian Reschke wrote:

> Issue #1: clients that do PUT without passing a content type -- what's the
> recommended server behaviour upon subsequent GETs? If the server *does*
> guess, and guesses wrong, the client ends up with a wrong content type --
> wouldn't be preferable then not to send a content type at all (in which case
> the client issuing the GET would need to guess)?

I think that in this case it's reasonable for the server to guess or to 
not guess based on the application needs.  I don't see an architectural 
issue.

> Issue #2: if a client *does* send the content type with PUT, is a server
> allowed to override that (that's what currently happens with
> Apache/moddav).?

Really?  Blecch.  This seems completely 100% architecturally wrong and 
should be fixed.

-- 
Cheers, Tim Bray
         (ongoing fragmented essay: http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/)

Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2003 14:59:11 UTC