- From: Williams, Stuart <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 18:08:17 -0000
- To: "'Paul Cotton'" <pcotton@microsoft.com>, "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>, "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
> Given the number of outstanding items on this agenda can the TAG agree > to extend this call by at least 30 minutes? If we can agree this ahead of the call that would be helpful. I'd be happy to extend the call with the consent of those that intend to be on the call. Ian, could you add the other references from Paul to the agenda. Thanks, Stuart -- > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Cotton [mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com] > Sent: 20 March 2003 17:42 > To: Ian B. Jacobs; skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com > Cc: www-tag@w3.org > Subject: RE: [Agenda] 24 Mar 2003 TAG teleconf (IRIEverywhere-27, > URIEquivalence-15, xmlIDSemantics-32, contentTypeOverride-24) > > > > Given the number of outstanding items on this agenda can the TAG agree > to extend this call by at least 30 minutes? > > > 2.1 New Issues? > > > > * See input from Jonathan Marsh ([13]forwarded by Paul Cotton); > > related to # rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6 > > > > [13] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0207.html > > Please add [13a] to this discussion. > > > 8. See [19]PC's email on feedback from Tech Plenary > > Please add [19a] to this discussion > > /paulc > > [13a] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0063.html > [Member only] > [19a] > http://www.w3.org/2003/03/Plenary-Minutes.html#Session3 > > Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada > 17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 > Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 > mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ian B. Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org] > > Sent: March 20, 2003 9:52 AM > > To: www-tag@w3.org > > Subject: [Agenda] 24 Mar 2003 TAG teleconf (IRIEverywhere-27, > > URIEquivalence-15, xmlIDSemantics-32, contentTypeOverride-24) > > > > > > Hello, > > > > The agenda for the 24 Mar 2003 TAG teleconf is > > available as HTML [1] and text below. > > > > - Ian > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/24-tag.html > > > > ================================================== > > > > Agenda for 24 Mar 2003 TAG teleconference > > > > Nearby: [4]Teleconference details * [5]issues list * [6]www-tag > > archive > > > > [4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/#remote > > [5] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist > > [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/ > > > > Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change > after close of > > business (Boston time) Thursday of this week. > > > > 1. Administrative (30min) > > > > 1. Confirm Chair, Scribe. Regrets: TBL. At risk: CL > > 2. Accept [7]17 Feb telecon minutes? > > 3. Accept this [8]agenda? > > 4. Next meeting: 31 March? > > > > [7] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/17-tag-summary.html > > [8] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/24-tag.html > > > > 1.1 Meeting planning > > > > * The TAG will strive to organize a virtual meeting > shortly after > > the WWW Conference. > > Action TBL 2003/03/17: Propose June dates (after 4 June). > [Also, > > some willingness also to meet before May confs] > > * Proposed 14-15 Nov Japan > > * If confirmed, IJ to ask Member calendar to be updated. > > * Upcoming discussions: > > + The TAG expects to discuss its [9]W3C track presentation > > early-April. > > + The TAG expects to discuss its presentation to the AC > > mid-April. > > > > [9] http://www2003.org/t_www.htm > > > > 1.2 Mailing list management > > > > * Incorporate some [10]proposed text from Stuart Williams into > the > > [11]tips on communicating with the TAG. > > Completed action IJ 2003/03/17: Incorporate said text. Then, > > action SW: Send msg to www-tag drawing people's attention to > > revised text. (Done by IJ's message?) > > * Create a new list (public-tag-announce) for announcements of > > meeting minutes, meeting summaries, findings, new issues, > resolved > > issues, and drafts of architecture documents. > > Completed action IJ 2003/03/17: Request list setup; > update TAG > > home page. ([12]Done). PC has requested that list be > announced > to > > AC/Chairs/TP list. > > * IJ wishes to confirm that (1) all mail goes to > www-tag and (2) > cc > > some messages to public-tag-announce > > > > [10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0053.html > > [11] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/#tag-attn > > [12] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Mar/0047.html > > > > 2. Technical (60min) > > > > 2.1 New Issues? > > > > * See input from Jonathan Marsh ([13]forwarded by Paul Cotton); > > related to # rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6 > > > > [13] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0207.html > > > > 2.2 Architecture document > > > > See also: [14]findings. > > 1. [15]21 Feb 2003 Editor's Draft of Arch Doc: > > 1. Action IJ 2003/03/17: Draft a new hybrid that > incorporates > > intro of 6 Feb draft into 21 Feb version. > > 2. Action DC 2003/02/06: Attempt a redrafting of 1st para > under > > [16]2.2.4 of 6 Feb 2003 draft > > 3. Action DC 2003/01/27: write two pages on correct and > > incorrect application of REST to an actual web > page design > > 4. Action DO 2003/01/27: Please send writings regarding Web > > services to tag@w3.org. DO grants DC license to cut and > paste > > and put into DC writing. > > 5. Action CL 2003/0127: Draft language for arch doc that > takes > > language from internet media type registration, propose > for > > arch doc, include sentiment of TB's second sentence from > > CP10. > > 6. Action TB 2003/01/27: Develop CP11 more: Avoid designing > new > > protocols if you can accomplish what you want with HTTP. > DC > > suggested describing GET/PUT/POST in a para > each, then say > > "if your app looks like that, use HTTP". > [17]Proposal from > TB > > to withdraw the proposal. > > 7. Action DC 2003/03/17: : Write some text for interactions > > chapter of arch doc related to [18]message > passing, a dual > of > > shared state. > > 8. See [19]PC's email on feedback from Tech Plenary > > > > [14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings > > [15] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/webarch-20030221 > > [16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/webarch-20030206#uri-use > > [17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0005 > > [18] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Mar/0018.html > > [19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0050.html > > > > 2.3 Issues the TAG intends to discuss > > > > * [20]IRIEverywhere-27 > > + Action CL/IJ 2003/03/17: Send edited piece that CL/MD/IJ > > wrote to www-tag. Deadline 24 Mar > > * [21]URIEquivalence-15 > > + See [22]draft 4. See also [23]email from Larry > Masinter on > > xml namespaces. > > + Completed action TBL 2003/01/20: Send email to > uri@w3.org > > requesting terminology change (regarding definition of > > "URI"). ([24]Done) > > * [25]xmlIDSemantics-32 > > + Status of Chris Lilley draft finding in this area? > > * [26]contentTypeOverride-24 > > + See [27]email from DC to Voice Browser WG. Does this > resolve > > this issue? > > * Updates or reports on other issues? > > > > [20] > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#IRIEverywhere-27 > > [21] > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#URIEquivalence-15 > > [22] http://www.textuality.com/tag/uri-comp-4.html > > [23] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0090.html > > [24] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2003Jan/0005.html > > [25] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xmlIDSemantics-32 > > [26] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open- > > summary.html#contentTypeOverride-24 > > [27] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0085.html > > > > 2.4 Issues that have associated action items > > > > * [28]xlinkScope-23 > > + Status report? > > + Completed action SW 2003/03/17: Draft note for > TAG review > of > > comments to two CGs on the tone of today's discussion. > > ([29]Done) > > * [30]siteData-36 > > + Action TBL 2003/02/24 : Summarize siteData-36 > > * [31]namespaceDocument-8 > > + Next steps on [32]RDDL Proposal from Tim > Bray/Paul Cotton > > * [33]xmlFunctions-34 > > + Action TBL 2003/02/06: State the issue with a > reference to > > XML Core work. See [34]email from TimBL > capturing some of > the > > issues. > > * [35]binaryXML-30 > > + Action TB 2003/02/17: Write to www-tag with his thoughts > on > > adding to survey. > > + Next steps to finding? See [36]summary from Chris. > > * [37]contentPresentation-26 > > + Action CL 2003/02/06: Create a draft finding in this > space. > > Deadline 3 March. > > * [38]rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6 > > + Action DC 2003/02/06: Propose TAG response to XML Schema > > desideratum ([39]RQ-23). > > * [40]uriMediaType-9 > > + Action DC 2003/02/06: Start discussion on > > discuss@apps.ietf.org, but not urgent > > * [41]HTTPSubstrate-16 > > + Action RF 2003/02/06: Write a response to IESG asking > whether > > the Web services example in the SOAP 1.2 primer is > intended > > to be excluded from RFC 3205 > > + See [42]message from Larry Masinter w.r.t. Web services. > > * [43]errorHandling-20 > > + Action CL 2003/02/06: Write a draft finding on the topic > of > > (1) early/late detection of errors (2) > late/early binding > (3) > > robustness (4) definition of errors (5) recovery once > error > > has been signaled. Deadline first week of March. > > * [44]metadataInURI-31 > > + Action SW 2003/02/06: Draft finding for this one. > > * [45]fragmentInXML-28 : Use of fragment identifiers in XML. > > 1. Connection to content negotiation? > > 2. Connection to opacity of URIs? > > 3. No actions associated / no owner. > > > > [28] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#xlinkScope-23 > > [29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0075.html > > [30] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#siteData-36 > > [31] > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#namespaceDocument-8 > > [32] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0213 > > [33] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xmlFunctions-34 > > [34] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0309.html > > [35] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#binaryXML-30 > > [36] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0224.html > > [37] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open- > > summary.html#contentPresentation-26 > > [38] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open- > > summary.html#rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6 > > [39] > http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xmlschema-11-req-20030121/#N400183 > > [40] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#uriMediaType-9 > [41] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#HTTPSubstrate-16 > [42] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0208.html > [43] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#errorHandling-20 > [44] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#metadataInURI-31 > [45] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#fragmentInXML-28 > > 3. Other actions > > * Action IJ 2003/02/06: Modify issues list to show that > actions/pending are orthogonal to decisions. IJ is working with > PLH on this. Revisit this end of April. > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > Ian Jacobs for Stuart Williams and TimBL > Last modified: $Date: 2003/03/20 14:46:17 $ > > -- > Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs > Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Thursday, 20 March 2003 13:08:44 UTC