- From: Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:41:38 -0500
- To: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>, <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
Given the number of outstanding items on this agenda can the TAG agree to extend this call by at least 30 minutes? > 2.1 New Issues? > > * See input from Jonathan Marsh ([13]forwarded by Paul Cotton); > related to # rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6 > > [13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0207.html Please add [13a] to this discussion. > 8. See [19]PC's email on feedback from Tech Plenary Please add [19a] to this discussion /paulc [13a] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0063.html [Member only] [19a] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/Plenary-Minutes.html#Session3 Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Ian B. Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org] > Sent: March 20, 2003 9:52 AM > To: www-tag@w3.org > Subject: [Agenda] 24 Mar 2003 TAG teleconf (IRIEverywhere-27, > URIEquivalence-15, xmlIDSemantics-32, contentTypeOverride-24) > > > Hello, > > The agenda for the 24 Mar 2003 TAG teleconf is > available as HTML [1] and text below. > > - Ian > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/24-tag.html > > ================================================== > > Agenda for 24 Mar 2003 TAG teleconference > > Nearby: [4]Teleconference details * [5]issues list * [6]www-tag > archive > > [4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/#remote > [5] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist > [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/ > > Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change after close of > business (Boston time) Thursday of this week. > > 1. Administrative (30min) > > 1. Confirm Chair, Scribe. Regrets: TBL. At risk: CL > 2. Accept [7]17 Feb telecon minutes? > 3. Accept this [8]agenda? > 4. Next meeting: 31 March? > > [7] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/17-tag-summary.html > [8] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/24-tag.html > > 1.1 Meeting planning > > * The TAG will strive to organize a virtual meeting shortly after > the WWW Conference. > Action TBL 2003/03/17: Propose June dates (after 4 June). [Also, > some willingness also to meet before May confs] > * Proposed 14-15 Nov Japan > * If confirmed, IJ to ask Member calendar to be updated. > * Upcoming discussions: > + The TAG expects to discuss its [9]W3C track presentation > early-April. > + The TAG expects to discuss its presentation to the AC > mid-April. > > [9] http://www2003.org/t_www.htm > > 1.2 Mailing list management > > * Incorporate some [10]proposed text from Stuart Williams into the > [11]tips on communicating with the TAG. > Completed action IJ 2003/03/17: Incorporate said text. Then, > action SW: Send msg to www-tag drawing people's attention to > revised text. (Done by IJ's message?) > * Create a new list (public-tag-announce) for announcements of > meeting minutes, meeting summaries, findings, new issues, resolved > issues, and drafts of architecture documents. > Completed action IJ 2003/03/17: Request list setup; update TAG > home page. ([12]Done). PC has requested that list be announced to > AC/Chairs/TP list. > * IJ wishes to confirm that (1) all mail goes to www-tag and (2) cc > some messages to public-tag-announce > > [10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0053.html > [11] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/#tag-attn > [12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Mar/0047.html > > 2. Technical (60min) > > 2.1 New Issues? > > * See input from Jonathan Marsh ([13]forwarded by Paul Cotton); > related to # rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6 > > [13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0207.html > > 2.2 Architecture document > > See also: [14]findings. > 1. [15]21 Feb 2003 Editor's Draft of Arch Doc: > 1. Action IJ 2003/03/17: Draft a new hybrid that incorporates > intro of 6 Feb draft into 21 Feb version. > 2. Action DC 2003/02/06: Attempt a redrafting of 1st para under > [16]2.2.4 of 6 Feb 2003 draft > 3. Action DC 2003/01/27: write two pages on correct and > incorrect application of REST to an actual web page design > 4. Action DO 2003/01/27: Please send writings regarding Web > services to tag@w3.org. DO grants DC license to cut and paste > and put into DC writing. > 5. Action CL 2003/0127: Draft language for arch doc that takes > language from internet media type registration, propose for > arch doc, include sentiment of TB's second sentence from > CP10. > 6. Action TB 2003/01/27: Develop CP11 more: Avoid designing new > protocols if you can accomplish what you want with HTTP. DC > suggested describing GET/PUT/POST in a para each, then say > "if your app looks like that, use HTTP". [17]Proposal from TB > to withdraw the proposal. > 7. Action DC 2003/03/17: : Write some text for interactions > chapter of arch doc related to [18]message passing, a dual of > shared state. > 8. See [19]PC's email on feedback from Tech Plenary > > [14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings > [15] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/webarch-20030221 > [16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/webarch-20030206#uri-use > [17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0005 > [18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Mar/0018.html > [19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0050.html > > 2.3 Issues the TAG intends to discuss > > * [20]IRIEverywhere-27 > + Action CL/IJ 2003/03/17: Send edited piece that CL/MD/IJ > wrote to www-tag. Deadline 24 Mar > * [21]URIEquivalence-15 > + See [22]draft 4. See also [23]email from Larry Masinter on > xml namespaces. > + Completed action TBL 2003/01/20: Send email to uri@w3.org > requesting terminology change (regarding definition of > "URI"). ([24]Done) > * [25]xmlIDSemantics-32 > + Status of Chris Lilley draft finding in this area? > * [26]contentTypeOverride-24 > + See [27]email from DC to Voice Browser WG. Does this resolve > this issue? > * Updates or reports on other issues? > > [20] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#IRIEverywhere-27 > [21] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#URIEquivalence-15 > [22] http://www.textuality.com/tag/uri-comp-4.html > [23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0090.html > [24] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2003Jan/0005.html > [25] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xmlIDSemantics-32 > [26] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open- > summary.html#contentTypeOverride-24 > [27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0085.html > > 2.4 Issues that have associated action items > > * [28]xlinkScope-23 > + Status report? > + Completed action SW 2003/03/17: Draft note for TAG review of > comments to two CGs on the tone of today's discussion. > ([29]Done) > * [30]siteData-36 > + Action TBL 2003/02/24 : Summarize siteData-36 > * [31]namespaceDocument-8 > + Next steps on [32]RDDL Proposal from Tim Bray/Paul Cotton > * [33]xmlFunctions-34 > + Action TBL 2003/02/06: State the issue with a reference to > XML Core work. See [34]email from TimBL capturing some of the > issues. > * [35]binaryXML-30 > + Action TB 2003/02/17: Write to www-tag with his thoughts on > adding to survey. > + Next steps to finding? See [36]summary from Chris. > * [37]contentPresentation-26 > + Action CL 2003/02/06: Create a draft finding in this space. > Deadline 3 March. > * [38]rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6 > + Action DC 2003/02/06: Propose TAG response to XML Schema > desideratum ([39]RQ-23). > * [40]uriMediaType-9 > + Action DC 2003/02/06: Start discussion on > discuss@apps.ietf.org, but not urgent > * [41]HTTPSubstrate-16 > + Action RF 2003/02/06: Write a response to IESG asking whether > the Web services example in the SOAP 1.2 primer is intended > to be excluded from RFC 3205 > + See [42]message from Larry Masinter w.r.t. Web services. > * [43]errorHandling-20 > + Action CL 2003/02/06: Write a draft finding on the topic of > (1) early/late detection of errors (2) late/early binding (3) > robustness (4) definition of errors (5) recovery once error > has been signaled. Deadline first week of March. > * [44]metadataInURI-31 > + Action SW 2003/02/06: Draft finding for this one. > * [45]fragmentInXML-28 : Use of fragment identifiers in XML. > 1. Connection to content negotiation? > 2. Connection to opacity of URIs? > 3. No actions associated / no owner. > > [28] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#xlinkScope-23 > [29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0075.html > [30] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#siteData-36 > [31] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#namespaceDocument-8 > [32] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0213 > [33] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xmlFunctions-34 > [34] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0309.html > [35] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#binaryXML-30 > [36] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0224.html > [37] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open- > summary.html#contentPresentation-26 > [38] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open- > summary.html#rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6 > [39] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xmlschema-11-req-20030121/#N400183 > [40] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#uriMediaType-9 > [41] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#HTTPSubstrate-16 > [42] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0208.html > [43] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#errorHandling-20 > [44] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#metadataInURI-31 > [45] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#fragmentInXML-28 > > 3. Other actions > > * Action IJ 2003/02/06: Modify issues list to show that > actions/pending are orthogonal to decisions. IJ is working with > PLH on this. Revisit this end of April. > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > Ian Jacobs for Stuart Williams and TimBL > Last modified: $Date: 2003/03/20 14:46:17 $ > > -- > Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs > Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Thursday, 20 March 2003 12:42:01 UTC