Tim Bray wrote, > Paul Cotton wrote: > > Q2: Your text "URNs are not effectively usable" might lead me to > > believe that there might be an effort ongoing to standardize how to > > retrieve resources using URNs. Do you know of such an effort? > > Yes, there are such efforts in the IETF; the acronym doesn't spring > to mind, but that doesn't matter, because I'm sure that several other > people will spring forward to explain why URNs are in fact > retrievable and that TimBL and I are blowing smoke when we claim > they're not. ;-) It's DDDS, and Michael Mealling has collected the relevant RFCs here, http://www.uri.net/ > I accept that mechanisms in principle exist to dereference URNs, it's > just that I've never used a computer where such software was > installed, so it's clearly far from ubiquitous. It's ubiquitous, just under-exploited. All that's needed is a DNS resolver that's a little more flexible than gethostbyname and gethostbyaddr. Cheers, MilesReceived on Tuesday, 8 April 2003 20:33:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:58 UTC