- From: <DPawson@rnib.org.uk>
- Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 16:15:20 +0100
- To: jonathan@openhealth.org, paul@prescod.net, Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Borden > Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 1:07 AM > Which underscores the fact that RDF is a good generalization > of all this > stuff. With RDF you can express any semantics desired by e.g. > the HTML WG > with HLink etc. > > Why not just use XHTML+RDF, and the HTML WG develop a > particular terminology > which expresses its needs? Correction Jonathan. You may be able to express any semantics desired... 99% of users simply can't and this one certainly wouldn't want to. Like Paul, I'm sure some syntax could be worked out to match the semantics that appear to be clarifying around Norm's ideas. Regards DaveP. ******* snip here ************* - NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your system. RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2002 11:18:21 UTC