- From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
- Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 14:47:05 +0100
- To: "'Paul Prescod'" <paul@prescod.net>, "'Jonathan Borden'" <jonathan@openhealth.org>, <www-tag@w3.org>
> Paul Prescod > If RDF > clears up its relationship with what Dan Brickley calls "colloquial > XML"[1] then I think that it would have a strong case as a > replacement > for XLink. FTR: Ron Daniel's note Harvesting RDF Statements from XLinks is here: http://www.w3.org/TR/xlink2rdf/ It's out of date wrt the current RDF canon, but it could be useful as a strawman. Bill de hÓra -- Propylon www.propylon.com
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2002 11:07:10 UTC