Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs

On Monday, May 27, 2002, at 09:23  PM, Martin Duerst wrote:

>> (in contrast to http:, where lower-case is dominant)

It's not just a good idea, it's the law, no? That is, RFC2616 requires 
"http" to be in lower case and I don't see anything in RFC2396 about 
case-insensitive scheme comparison. Am I missing something?

Aaron Swartz []

Received on Monday, 27 May 2002 23:16:14 UTC