Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs

At 19:10 02/05/27 +0900, Martin Duerst wrote:
>Dear TAG,
>
>Here is my input on the issue of URI/IRI equivalence, for
>your consideration. This is a very important issue for IRIs.

Just one small correction, probably obvious:


>There is an argument for making %4C and %4c the same, because
>there is no clear convention of using upper-case or lower case
>(in contrast to http:, where lower-case is dominant). Also, there
>is never ever any doubt that they would refer to different resources.

As Misha has pointed out to me, the last sentence should be:

Also, there is never ever any doubt that they would refer to the
same resorce.

Regards,   Martin.

Received on Monday, 27 May 2002 22:23:27 UTC