Re: updated findings on whenToUseGet

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tim Bray" <tbray@textuality.com>
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 2:18 PM
Subject: Re: updated findings on whenToUseGet


> Dan Connolly wrote:
> > I updated the finding w.r.t. 5May discussion.
> > 
> > Chris, I still need some text from you about
> > the I18N situation.
> > 
> >   http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/get7
> 
> - Needs spell-checking & beautification
> - in the excellent mailing-list subscription example, you never actually 
> come out and say in so many words that the second way of doing things is 
> WRONG and BROKEN.  You imply it but should go further.

Agree totally.   We need  a MUST here, and  SECURITY ISSUE.
Your system may be subject to malicious attack.


> - as Stuart pointed out, could use a little more preaching on the 
> desirability of having URIs - I liked Stuart's proposed 1) 2) 3) list.
> 
> Maybe the thing to do is to get Ian to take Dan's prose, work Stuart's 
> list in, beautify & polish it, and I think we're done with this.  -Tim
>

Received on Monday, 20 May 2002 15:04:54 UTC