- From: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 13:20:00 -0700
- To: "Tim Bray" <tbray@textuality.com>, <www-tag@w3.org>
> 1. Type-augmented XML is a good thing and a recommendation should be > prepared describing it both at the infoset and syntax level. (I gather Type-augmented XML needs a type system. Which are you recommending? A) Single spec, which uses one existing type system (XSD, WebOnt, XDR, RDFS, etc.) B) One spec for each C) Single spec that combines many existing type systems D) Yet another type system > 4. Work on XQuery and other things that require a Type-Augmented Infoset > must not depend on schema processing, and should not have normative > linkages to any schema language specifications. Are you saying that the XQuery type-augmented infoset should be in a separate spec (which might have normative linkage to XSD), or that the XQuery should be changed to allow *any* type-augmented infoset spec that someone chooses to implement?
Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2002 16:20:32 UTC