- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 10 Jun 2002 13:57:02 -0500
- To: www-tag@w3.org, Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
re "ACTION DanC: research the bug in the svg diagram." -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jun/0019.html short version: it's not essential, not even clearly relevant, not well-reviewed; I suggest getting rid of it. Details: the link text describes it as an "SVG diagram for determining character encoding"; but it seems to be more and less than that: it's not just the rules for determining the character encoding, it's also info about how to check consistency between apparent and actual encoding. And it's got heuristics, as well as rules, for sniffing out encodings. And... Martin, I can't find my notes, but didn't we find a bug in it somewhere? You were going to contact TimBL about it, as I recall. But I can't find mail to that effect either. Did the diagram help any readers? Would you miss it? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 10 June 2002 14:57:03 UTC