- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 13:58:06 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Hello,
The 10 June agenda is available at HTML [1] and below as
text.
- Ian
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/06/10-tag
--
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel: +1 718 260-9447
============================================================
[1]W3C [2]| TAG | Previous: [3]3 Jun | Next: 17 Jun
[1] http://www.w3.org/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jun/0019.html
Agenda for 10 June 2002 TAG teleconference
Nearby: [4]IRC log · [5]teleconference details · [6]issues list ·
[7]www-tag archive
[4] http://www.w3.org/2002/06/10-tagmem-irc.html
[5] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/#remote
[6] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist
[7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/
Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change after close of
business (Boston time) Thursday of this week.
Regrets: David Orchard, Paul Cotton, Stuart Williams
1. Administrative (15min)
1. Confirm scribe
2. Roll call
3. Accept this [8]agenda
4. Next meeting? Proposed 17 June
5. Accept [9]3 June minutes
6. Confirm status of [10]completed actions
7. Confirm status of [11]withdrawn actions
[8] http://www.w3.org/2002/06/10-tag
[9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jun/0019
1.2 Completed actions?
* ACTION IJ [12]2002/6/03: Add [13]errorHandling-20 to issues list
* ACTION IJ [14]2002/6/03: Add [15]RFC3023Charset-21 to issues
list.
[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jun/0019.html
[13] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#errorHandling-20
[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jun/0019.html
[15] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#RFC3023Charset-21
1.3 Withdrawn actions?
2. Technical (75min)
2.1 New issues?
* None noted. Have we missed any?
2.2 Findings in progress, architecture document (25min)
See also: [16]findings.
1. [17]URIs, Addressability, and the use of GET ([18]whenToUseGet-7
finding)
1. ACTION CL 2002/05/05: Add concern regarding non-western
characters to the POST scenario
2. ACTION IJ [19]2002/05/20: Revise and publish
[20]whenToUseGet-7 finding Also, per 27 May teleconf,
action
to incorporate comments from SW. Discussion postponed until
10 June since IJ not at 3 June meeting, update still
pending.
3. ACTION DO [21]2002/6/03: Report to the XMLP task force that
for operations where GET would be appropriate SOAP nodes
should provide the ability to use GET
2. Finding for [22]formattingProperties-19
1. ACTION NW [23]2002/05/20: Draft a finding for
formattingProperties-19; find out source of issue from
CSS WG
3. [24]QNames as Identifiers ([25]qnameAsId-18)
1. Review draft finding from NW.
4. [26]Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use
1. ACTION DC: research the bug in the svg diagram.
5. Architecture document
1. ACTION IJ [27]2002/03/18: Integrate/combine one-page
summaries ([28]Revised)
2. ACTION TBL [29]2002/05/05: Negotiate more of IJ time
for arch
doc
[16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
[17] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/get7
[18] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/get7
[19] http://www.w3.org/2002/05/20-tag-summary#whenToUseGet
[20] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/get7
[21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jun/0019.html
[22] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#formattingProperties-19
[23] http://www.w3.org/2002/05/20-tag-summary#formattingProperties
[24] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/qnameids.html
[25] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#qnameAsId-18
[26] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/0129-mime
[27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Mar/0063.html
[28] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/0508-intro
[29] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/0505-agenda#Session
2.3 Priority issues (50min)
1. Response from XMLP WG about the use of GET in SOAP.
([30]Heads-up
from XMLP WG, tag-only)
+ ACTION DO/TB/CL [31]2002/05/05: Pending XMLP response,
polish
up DO's .1-level draft and find out [32]what's going on
with
XForms
2. [33]RFC3023Charset-21
+ ACTION CL [34]2002/6/03: Write up the issue in the next day
or so.
3. [35]charmodReview-17:
+ ACTION NW [36]2002/6/03: Tell I18N WG that TAG has
agreed to
[37]comments from CL with amendments from NW. See other TAG
resolutions regarding this issue in [38]3 June minutes.
4. Status of [39]URIEquivalence-15. Relation to Character Model of
the Web (chapter 4)? See text from TimBL on [40]URI
canonicalization and [41]email from Martin in particular.
5. If we get here: [42]httpRange-14, [43]namespaceDocument-8
[30] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2002Jun/0003.html
[31] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/0505-agenda#L905
[32] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Feb/0175
[33] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#RFC3023Charset-21
[34] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jun/0019.html
[35] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#charmodReview-17
[36] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jun/0019.html
[37] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002May/0164.html
[38] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jun/0019
[39] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#URIEquivalence-15
[40] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Axioms.html#canonicalization
[41] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002May/0161
[42] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#httpRange-14
[43] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#namespaceDocument-8
_________________________________________________________________
Ian Jacobs, for TimBL
Last modified: $Date: 2002/06/06 17:59:16 $
Received on Thursday, 6 June 2002 14:00:39 UTC