W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > July 2002

Re: Fragment identifiers and intermediaries

From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 16:12:56 -0400
Message-ID: <071401c234e0$d5744240$0a2e249b@nemc.org>
To: <www-tag@w3.org>, "Christopher B Ferris" <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>

Christopher B Ferris wrote:
>...These seem only to have conventional
> interpretation as meaning, "some element that has an attribute that is
> of type ID that has the same value as the fragment identifier". Of course,
> RDF doesn't have a DTD, ...

Well actually, if RDF did have an XML Schema then type

attribute rdf:ID{xsd:ID}

 would do fine for naked fragids, according to XPointer. Now RDF does have a
RELAXNG, which _would work_ if XPointer referenced that as well, but it
doesn't so your point stands.

This all sort of almost works, but not quite ...

Received on Friday, 26 July 2002 16:18:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:53 UTC