- From: Lucas Gonze <lgonze@panix.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 17:11:34 -0400 (EDT)
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
As groundwork, I wonder about the W3C's ability to comment on legal issues. A precedent is that proper use of GET and POST should shield a client from liability for side effects as a result of a GET. But still, it's a funny idea. Not that I disagree with the reasoning behind the statement that deep linking is not an illegal act -- I don't -- but that it's not clear what the technical community's role is. - Lucas On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Ian B. Jacobs wrote: > > Hello, > > At their 22 July 2002 teleconf [1], the TAG accepted issue > deepLinking-25 [2]: > > What to say in defense of principle that deep linking > is not an illegal act? > > - Ian > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/07/22-tag-summary > [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#deepLinking-25 > >
Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2002 17:17:21 UTC