- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:52:38 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Hello, The agenda for the 15 July 2002 TAG teleconf is available as HTML [1] and text below. - Ian [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/07/15-tag -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447 ------------------------------------------------------------- [1]W3C [2]| TAG | Previous: [3]8 Jul | Next: 22 July [1] http://www.w3.org/ [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ [3] http://www.w3.org/2002/07/08-tag-summary Agenda for 15 July 2002 TAG teleconference Nearby: [4]Teleconference details · [5]issues list · [6]www-tag archive [4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/#remote [5] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/ Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change after close of business (Boston time) Thursday of this week. 1. Administrative (15min) 1. Confirm scribe 2. Roll call. Regrets: CL 3. Accept this [7]agenda 4. Next meeting? Proposed 22 July. 5. Accept [8]8 July minutes 6. Confirm status of [9]completed actions 7. Confirm status of [10]withdrawn actions [None] [7] http://www.w3.org/2002/07/08-tag [8] http://www.w3.org/2002/07/08-tag-summary 1.2 Completed actions? 1. IJ: Find out whether the W3C Comm Team expects to have a publishing moratorium in August. (Awaiting reply). 2. Technical (75min) 2.1 Findings in progress, architecture document (45min) See also: [11]findings. 1. Architecture document 1. ACTION TBL [12]2002/05/05: Negotiate more of IJ time for arch doc 2. ACTION RF 2002/06/24: Write a paragraph on technical and political aspects of URIs and URI References. 3. Action TB, DC 2002/07/08: Propose text for section 1.1 (URI Schemes) 4. Action CL 2002/07/08: Propose text for section 2 (Formats). Deadline 30 July. 5. Action DC 2002/07/08: Ask Michael Mealing when IETF decided not to use HTTP URis to name protocols. 6. Action IJ 2002/07/08: Produce WD of Arch Doc. Deadline 30 August. 2. [13]Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use. + Action PC 2002/07/08: Propose alternative wording for finding regarding IANA registration. Refer to "[14]How to Register a Media Type with IANA (for the IETF tree) " 3. [15]Qnames as identifiers 1. Action NW 2002/06/24: Follow up on [16]Rick Jelliffe comments/proposal. 4. [17]Consistency of Formatting Property Names, Values, and Semantics + Status of this finding after NW responds to [18]comments from Hakon? [11] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings [12] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/0505-agenda#Session [13] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/0129-mime [14] http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype [15] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/qnameids.html [16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jun/0126 [17] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/formatting-properties [18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jul/0120.html 2.2 Priority issues (30min) 1. [19]httpRange-14: Need to make progress here to advance in Arch Document. 2. [20]uriMediaType-9: Status of negotiation with IETF? See [21]message from DanC. + Action TBL: Get a reply from the IETF on the TAG finding. 3. RFC3023Charset-21: + Action CL: Send copy of information sent to tag regarding [22]RFC3023Charset-21 to www-tag. 4. Status of [23]URIEquivalence-15. Relation to Character Model of the Web (chapter 4)? See text from TimBL on [24]URI canonicalization and [25]email from Martin in particular. 5. Status of discussions with WSA WG about SOAP/WSDL/GET/Query strings? + ACTION DO 2002/06/24: Contact WSDL WG about this issue (bindings, query strings and schemas) to ensure that it's on their radar. See [26]discussions from 24 Jun TAG teleconf. 6. [27]RFC3023Charset-21 + ACTION CL [28]2002/6/03: Send [29]writeup on this issue to www-tag. 7. augmentedInfoset-22: + [30]Request from Tim Bray to decide this issue (disposition = closed). Pushback from Simon St. Laurent. + ACTION DC 2002/06/17: Talk to XML Schema WG about PSVI. Report to tag, who expects to decide whether to add as an issue next week. DanC has sent email; awaiting reply from XML Scheme WG. [19] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#httpRange-14 [20] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#uriMediaType-9 [21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2002Jun/0095.html [22] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#RFC3023Charset-21 [23] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#URIEquivalence-15 [24] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Axioms.html#canonicalization [25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002May/0161 [26] http://www.w3.org/2002/06/24-tag-summary.html#wsa-get [27] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#RFC3023Charset-21 [28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jun/0019.html [29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2002Jun/0090.html [30] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jul/0159.html 2.3 New issues? 1. Bad practice: Overriding HTTP content-type with a URI reference.[31]See email from TBL. 2. "Deep linking illegal" bad practice? See [32]email from Tim Bray. [31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jun/0117.html [32] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jul/0118.html _________________________________________________________________ Ian Jacobs, for TimBL Last modified: $Date: 2002/07/11 14:55:50 $
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2002 11:55:39 UTC