Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs

Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:

> 
> Unfortunately that horse has left the barn. The namespaces spec already 
> states that namespace URIs are compared character for character. Current 
> interpretation of that and current software practice is that ~ and %7e 
> and %7E are *not* the same.

Well, in point of fact I think that %7e and %7E are the same in any 
rational world, and I think we should try to get there.

The namespaces spec says "character by character" largely because this 
issue hadn't occurred to us at that time.  I think that we could choose 
to reinterpret the term right now with generally beneficial effect and 
with minimal software breakage.

I also think that we could write down a set of carefully limited 
circumstances where software could un-%-escape before comparing, once 
again to beneficial effect and with minimal breakage.

Having said that, I'll have to go back and carefully re-read the 
dialogue between Martin/Misha/Chris to get a better understanding and 
find out if I'm wrong. -Tim

Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2002 11:34:54 UTC