W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > July 2002

Re: Resource references/httpRange-14 (was: [Minutes] 1 July TAG teleconf)

From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 12:48:41 -0400
Message-ID: <019e01c221e8$525de650$0a2e249b@nemc.org>
To: "Graham Klyne" <GK@NineByNine.org>
Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>, "Paul Grosso" <pgrosso@arbortext.com>

Graham Klyne wrote:

> Yes.  If one presumes an RDF representation, that provides the
> MIME-type-relative interpretation according to rules of the RDF MIME
> type.  And if an RDF document representation is retrievable at the
> indicated URI-without-fragment, then it should be regarded as the defining
> document.

RDF at present doesn't seem to deal with this issue at all. RDF _might say_
that URIs are dereferenced with an Accept: application/rdf+xml
content-type -- which either succeeds or fails, and if it were to succeed
then ... but until RDF makes some statement about how an RDF "conformant"
application is supposed to dereference a URI, isn't it hard for the TAG to
make an issue?

Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2002 12:54:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:52 UTC