- From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 22:48:10 -0400
- To: "Duane Nickull" <duane@xmlglobal.com>, <www-tag@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Duane Nickull" <duane@xmlglobal.com> To: <www-tag@w3.org> Cc: <www-tag@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 5:32 PM Subject: Re: URI resolution (was Re: Summary of 8 April 2002 TAG teleconference) > Simon: > > RFC 2169 has been examined by the ebXML community in great depth for URN > resolution. We have several technical requirements for a mechanism that > can perform the following: > > 1. uniquely identify an xml element, fragment or document. > 2. carry the URI of a location to find out more about the object ( in > ebXML this means locating an ebXMl Registry). > 3. identify the protocol/interface used to talk to the location. The http: URI scheme is designed to do this. Just use it, instead of using URNs. > Several of us in ebXML are following this conversation closely hoping > that the work done here will solve the problems we are facing. A DNS > resolution service for URN's as described in several RFC's predominantly > by Michael Mealling initially seemed to be ideal but we also came to the > conclusion that DNS had its' flaws too. > > Nevertheless, it is a leading candidate for solving our problem. > > I would like to ask you to consider those three requirements as input > from the ebXML Architectural community when and if they are relevant. > > Thank you. > > Duane Nickull > -- > CTO, XML Global Technologies > **************************** > Transformation - http://www.xmlglobal.com/prod/foundation/ > ebXML Central - http://www.xmlglobal.com/prod/central/ >
Received on Thursday, 11 April 2002 22:48:06 UTC