- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 15:13:16 +0100
- To: "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "WWW TAG" <www-tag@w3.org>
Hi there, > > As the author of many, many, RDF-in-XHTML proposals, > > Do you have any particular favorites you could point me at. Sure. The following two are my favourites, making use of (i.e. extending the woefully inadequate) existing XHTML metadata constructs:- http://infomesh.net/2001/08/rdfinxhtml/ - Interpreting <link> and <meta> as RDF (that approach in action: http://infomesh.net/2001/tordf/?uri=http://infomesh.net/2001/05/sw/) http://www.doctypes.org/meta/NOTE-xhtml-augmeta.html - Augmented Metadata in XHTML (this was actually Murray's work, by and large) I've also taken other approaches, such as adding Dublin Core to XHTML with modularization, and I have an as-yet unpublished article which outlines a slightly more radical approach for encoding metadata in document formats. There was also a huge thread about the RDF-in-XHTML topic on www-rdf-interest:- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2001Apr/thread#206 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2001Apr/thread#241 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2001Apr/thread#274 - Threads From RDF IG, April 2001 For as long as there has been RDF, there have been people wanting to embed it in HTML! > > I smell a hack. > > ... or maybe just unwarranted optimism about the ease with > which XML vocabularies can be mixed ;-). Or both. But then again, it's not as if I'm pitching <marquee> :-) -- Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer @prefix : <http://purl.org/net/swn#> . :Sean :homepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
Received on Monday, 8 April 2002 10:14:33 UTC