- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 04:14:40 +0000
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- CC: Erik Dahlström <erik@xn--dahlstrm-t4a.net>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "Amelia Bellamy-Royds" <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, Tavmjong Bah <tavmjong@free.fr>
> On Oct 1, 2015, at 4:08 PM, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote: > > Hi, Dirk, Amelia, Cameron– > > We decided that we need (at least some of) you on the telcon to really deal with this issue and help move the CSS Writing Modes 3 spec to CR. > > Are you available to be on the telcon next week? I wonder what the issue is. I thought we resolved the last open issues at the FX TF meeting in Paris a couple of weeks ago? fantasai and Cameron were both it the meeting and overruled me :D. I myself will not be able to join. Greetings, Dirk > > Tav is going to be reviewing the spec in depth, and you can coordinate with him to provide feedback, if you can't be on the telcon. > > Thanks– > –Doug > > On 9/30/15 9:58 PM, Doug Schepers wrote: >> Hi, Erik– >> >> Can we please add the CSS Writing Modes 3 spec review to the agenda? >> Fantasai says she needs our feedback on 2 issues (listed below), and >> she's available to attend the telcon tomorrow to explain the issue. >> >> (Fantasai, telcon details below in Erik's original agenda email.) >> >> [[ >> I'm blocked on the SVGWG here: >> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-writing-modes-3/issues-cr-2014 >> >> Two issues require SVGWG review >> >> first one is https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2015Sep/0016.html >> >> That's the one that needs review of spec wording >> >> second issue is this >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2015Sep/0017.html >> >> The question on hand is whether we can fold 'writing-mode: rl' and >> 'writing-mode: lr' together >> >> From a CSS perspective, they're the same >> >> The different values don't affect anything in the CSS model >> >> They're both horizontal writing modes, and the rl vs. lr doesn't affect >> bidi >> >> But the SVG spec says they affect the "inline progression direction" >> and I can't figure out what that means or should have an effect on >> >> But it's quite clear that it doesn't affect reordering! >> >> There's a test file here >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2015Sep/att-0027/test.svg >> >> which does very interesting things in Presto >> >> but otherwise renders the two values identically in Blink and InkScape >> >> So, yeah, have fun with that? >> >> maybe someone in the group knows what the SVG spec was trying to say, >> and whether or not it was important >> ]] >> >> Regards– >> –Doug >> >> On 9/30/15 4:46 PM, Erik Dahlström wrote: >>> Please find the agenda for this week’s telcon below. >>> >>> Time: >>> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=10&day=1&year=2015&hour=20&min=30&sec=0&p1=0 >>> >>> >>> Phone: +1-617-324-0000 (access code: 649 040 824) >>> IRC for minutes/discussion: #svg on irc.w3.org, port 6665 >>> Agenda requests: http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/Agenda >>> WebEx logistics: https://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/WebEx >>> >>> Agenda: >>> >>> * Path stroking for paths that end with tight curves (Tav) >>> http://tavmjong.free.fr/blog/?p=1257 >>> >>> * Declarative animation and conformance >>> https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/23 >>> >>> * SVG 2 chapter progress >>> >>
Received on Friday, 2 October 2015 04:15:11 UTC