Re: Interactive Declarative Animation in <img>

On 3/26/15 7:10 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
> bz might have more concrete thoughts on this. bz: in a hypothetical
> world where browsers send events into <img> (for things like hover
> effects and event-triggered SMIL animation), can you think of any
> problem with *also* allowing clickable links in the image-document that
> point to anchors elsewhere within the image-document?

That depends on what it means to perform such a navigation, right?

Are we just talking about scrolling or something?  That should be ok, or 
at least not really any different from declarative animation, I think.


Received on Friday, 27 March 2015 02:32:02 UTC