- From: Philip Rogers <pdr@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 13:06:05 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com>, "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 4 June 2015 20:06:53 UTC
By "new interpolation scheme", I just mean the code that tweens from one path string to another. Because of the restrictions on animated paths, this is fairly straightforward as you pointed out. In Blink, it's about 300 lines of C++. On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Philip Rogers <pdr@google.com> wrote: > > I agree with your meta-point about not letting the perfect be the enemy > of > > the good, but SMIL has shown me that major vendor buy-in is a hard > > requirement. I was assuming, maybe pessimistically, that the IE team > would > > not support implementing a new interpolation scheme for the old path > syntax > > any sooner than a new spec could be written. Would someone from > Microsoft be > > willing to comment? > > I don't understand this comment. What "new interpolation scheme"? > > ~TJ >
Received on Thursday, 4 June 2015 20:06:53 UTC