Re: SVG animations without SMIL from Tab Atkins Jr. on 2015-06-04 (www-svg@w3.org from June 2015)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 13:02:44 -0700
To: Philip Rogers <pdr@google.com>
Cc: Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com>, "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDBJdC+QHxcsGyc4vUna-4x2NtYgNF80LV0hQZ8Ut1TxcQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Philip Rogers <pdr@google.com> wrote:
> I agree with your meta-point about not letting the perfect be the enemy of
> the good, but SMIL has shown me that major vendor buy-in is a hard
> requirement. I was assuming, maybe pessimistically, that the IE team would
> not support implementing a new interpolation scheme for the old path syntax
> any sooner than a new spec could be written. Would someone from Microsoft be
> willing to comment?

I don't understand this comment.  What "new interpolation scheme"?

~TJ

Received on Thursday, 4 June 2015 20:03:32 UTC