- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 20:51:40 +0200
- To: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
- Cc: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, dschulze@adobe.com, SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>, SVG public list <www-svg@w3.org>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>, janina@rednote.net
* Michael Cooper wrote: >By tying the deliverable to a single Working Group that everyone joins, >we are getting clear patent commitments from the people who join the >work. The alternative is a joint task force in which some people have >made a PF patent commitment, and others have made an SVG patent >commitment - it's more vague about what the actual commitment to the >specific work is. Could you explain why the SVG WG and PFWG cannot, like other groups do, publish the document jointly, or how that would be worse if the goal is to maximise chances that the result can be implemented royality-free? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Monday, 31 March 2014 18:52:24 UTC