- From: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 10:03:11 -0700
- To: www-svg@w3.org
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 04:55:04 -0700, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote: > I'm not sure which group to bring this issue to: > > Proposal: > <img src="myimage.svg" /> > would pick up the title in the SVG file and use it as though title were > set on the image tag. > > It works for <iframe src="myimage.svg"> and for inline SVG. But with > <img src>, no luck. > > Also, > <img src="myimage.svg" longdesc="myimage.svg" /> seems a little > redundant. > > SVG has <title> and <description>, but the <img> tag wasn't designed > with those in mind. > None of the targets <img> previously supported contained reasonably > useful title/description content. > > Ideas anyone? > > Google's SVG viewer also seems to suffer, it does not show the <title> > of the image. > > All viewers understand that <img> means static SVG content, no scripts, > limited references, and so forth. But it seems that most of them neglect > to process title. Am I doing something wrong there? They don't neglect it, it's just that all interactivity inside the svg file is disabled, it's as if the svg was a raster image. What you're proposing seems similar to asking for EXIF data to be used as title. -- Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Friday, 28 October 2011 17:03:54 UTC