- From: Dirk Schulze <vbs85@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 21:04:24 +0100
- To: Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <CEFB8E7D-AF75-4DC3-843D-B3DD1DD6F217@gmx.de>
> - I think the test has a problem with the meaning of some units. > The relation between px and absolute units like cm > depend on the resolution of the screen - therefore the > gray marker lines should be provided with the same units > as the used animation values (or see below with a user > dependent calculation of values or positions). Yes, like you wrote below, there were long discussions, not only in www-style. I could search the quotes, but I think you know them already since you actively took part on the discussions IIRC. All viewers I know take a fixed resolution. This is from the WebKit source code: // We always assume 96 CSS pixels in a CSS inch. This is the cold hard truth of the Web. // At high DPI, we may scale a CSS pixel, but the ratio of the CSS pixel to the so-called // "absolute" CSS length units like inch and pt is always fixed and never changes. The test works on Firefox as well as on Batik and on a local copy of WebKit here. So > > - The description is somehow surprising as well - > "Test possible values for 'calcMode="spline"', with both commas, whitespace, > and mixed separators"? Thanks, this line needs to be removed. The same for the title. Like I wrote in the comment on the SVG, I took test animate-elem-89-t as reference. This is the clincher :) > > - missing unit ex? Yes, would be good to test it as well. Now that we use the same fonts on all browsers. Cheers, Dirk > > - Note, that SVG tiny 1.2 and SVG 1.1 depend on CSS2.0 and > luckily not on the new CSS2.1 draft with obfuscated absolute units > (I sent already an LC-comment to www-style@w3.org > about this problem in CSS2.1), therefore such tests are > tricky. I have some in my test suite and the results with current > viewers are disappointing, not only due to their problems with > absolute units, therefore in general it is of course a good idea > to have such tests, but I think, for mixes of px and absolute > units it has to be interactive (PHP script for example) to allow > the tester to provide information about the current resolution > (relation between px and mm). > > Olaf >
Received on Friday, 25 February 2011 20:04:59 UTC