- From: Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:20:14 -0700
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTik6s2CtOm3Zn1ekRidHY6-b3DZVF7ubHfJj6bGW@mail.gmail.com>
Ok, I'll continue the discussion, hopefully I don't make a muck of things. a) For the second row, first column (flattening markup for simplicity): <img width='100' height='100'> <svg width='200' height='200'> <circle.../> </svg> </img> In an <img> context, IE9, Opera and WebKit display <img> differently than <object>, <iframe> and <embed> here. Firefox treats all four cases identically. Perhaps it has to do with these browsers "inferring" a viewBox in an <img> context? Has this behavior been specified somewhere? Perhaps [1] ? b) For the third row, first column: <img width='100' height='100'> <svg width='100%' height='100%' viewBox='0 0 200 200'> <circle .../> </svg> </img> It seems that only WebKit mucks this one up and I can't yet make sense of their erroneous behavior, but basically we want the sizing that WebKit uses for <object>, <iframe> and <embed>. Thoughts? Jeff [1] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2258 On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote: > Hey- > > Doug Schepers wrote (on 9/14/10 3:28 PM): > >> Jeff Schiller wrote (on 9/14/10 3:16 PM): >> >>> >>> Would it be difficult (or too time-consuming) to specify what each case >>> should look like for now? Something like: >>> >>> * 'show full circle' >>> * 'show only top-left quadrant of circle' >>> >>> for each case. >>> >> >> I will try to be as complete and precise as I can in the spec, and >> include examples, in addition to tests. >> >> When I get something worked up, I'll drop a line here. >> > > ... which is not to say people shouldn't keep talking about this here... > quite the contrary. But I don't know if I'll get to this for a week or so. > > > Regards- > -Doug Schepers > W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs >
Received on Tuesday, 14 September 2010 21:21:05 UTC