Re: Embedding SVG - need help

I don't have the time to read the other replies in this thread right now, but
here's my take:

For me on Mac, Mozilla nightly and Opera 10.61 show the same thing in all rows
except the second row. Mozilla has the <object> and <embed> entries in this row
wrong - scrollbars should not be displayed because SVG 1.1 says the width/height
of the referenced SVG file is overridden in these cases:

  http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/coords.html#ViewportSpace

IMO Opera has the <img> entry in this row wrong, since for <img> too the
width/height of the referenced SVG should be overridden by the width/height of
the <img>. I imagine Erik may disagree with me on this one case though.

IMO both browsers otherwise behave as the specs require them too.

Jonathan

On 14/09/2010 11:20, Jeff Schiller wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org
> <mailto:schepers@w3.org>> wrote:
> 
>     There's the SVG Integration spec:
>      http://dev.w3.org/SVG/modules/integration/SVGIntegration.html
> 
>     I've got a few actions to follow up on from the last SVG WG F2F, and as soon
>     as I update the draft, we will be pushing for a First Public Working Draft
>     on the spec.  It should answer some of the questions I anticipate you have.
> 
> 
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but that spec doesn't (yet?) cover sizing issues
> (though it does specify other important things like Referencing Modes.
> 
> For sizing, it seems there are a lot of things to consider:
> 
> - containing object's explicit/implicit size
> - <svg>'s size (fixed, percentage)
> - viewBox
> - preserveAspectRatio
> 
> I think the behavior might be specified across the CSS, HTML, SVG 1.1 specs, but
> it's really not 100% clear to me.  That's why I made that grid of 16 tests
> testing 3 dimensions (referencing element type, svg width/height, viewBox). 
> Note that there are other dimensions to the test that I didn't bother with (ones
> where <img> and <object> don't have specified sizes, preserveAspectRatio=none).
> 
> Maybe this is something that was covered clearly in the WICD/CDF specs?
> 
> Thanks,
> Jeff

Received on Tuesday, 14 September 2010 23:23:07 UTC