- From: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 10:07:36 +0200
- To: www-svg@w3.org
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 02:38:35 +0200, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com> wrote: ... > MY QUESTION: What should be used as the "base value" for this > animation on the child node? The actual underlying value is "inherit", > but what should that evaluate to, when we place it at the base of the > animation sandwich to compose the child's "by-animation"? Should we use > the parent's animated value, or the parent's underlying non-animated > value? ... > This problem is (slightly) more general than this, though -- in > particular, we hit the same basic question with the "currentColor" > value, with no inheritance at all. The situation for this is as > follows: if we animate the "color" attribute on an element that has e.g. > style="fill: currentColor", and then we begin a "by" animation on the > "fill" property, should the "color" animation feed into the base value > of the "fill" animation? (I'd say "yes".) That sounds quite similar to this testcase: http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/animate-elem-85-t.svg I'd like to hear your thoughts on that one. Cheers /Erik -- Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2010 08:08:16 UTC