- From: Felipe Sanches <juca@members.fsf.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 00:54:30 +0200
- To: robert@ocallahan.org
- Cc: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, www-svg@w3.org
>> I don't think that we disagree about the fundamental approach going >> forward; SVG Fonts should be developed in a separate module, and >> implementations should decide whether they support it depending on demand. >> I think there will be a strong case for it, but that's something to be >> decided later. > > > That sounds very good. In light of that, would it be reasonable to ask Hixie > to remove the SVG Fonts tests from Acid3? I think that a basic SVG Fonts support - with only path data description for glyphs - should remain as part of SVG, and then the more general, full featured, SVG Fonts (supporting glyphs described by arbitrary blocks of SVG) should be in a separate optional module. Felipe Sanches
Received on Wednesday, 2 June 2010 12:30:19 UTC