- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:56:19 -0500
- To: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
(The logging system had a hiccup... these minutes are from my IRC client log.) Meeting: SVG Working Group Teleconference Date: 25 January 2010 scribenick: shepazu chair: ed Present: ChrisL, ed, patrick_dengler, shepazu topic: Joint WG Meeting DS: heard back from some of CSS WG... some support, but concern that not all CSS WG members could attend ... suggested that we collocate with CSS WG F2F: 29-31 March 2010 ChrisL: so, they would give over part of their meeting time? DS: that's the idea DS: would those dates work for folks? all: no problem DS: proposal: SVG F2F, 30 March meet with WebApps/HTML, 31 March meet with CSS WG, 1-2 April hold DOM API summit/workshop Resolution: approach CSS WG with these dates action: shepazu to plan workshop and communicate with CSS WG about F2F trackbot: Created ACTION-2714 - Plan workshop and communicate with CSS WG about F2F [on Doug Schepers - due 2010-02-01]. Topic: SVG 1.1 2nd ed DS summarizes the clip-path/pointer-event clarification Resolution: we will use the rationale in Doug's email for clip-path/pointer-events ChrisL: are we still updating errata? ed: not any longer ChrisL: the 2nd edition will start over with new errata ... including ones we are still working on ed: we'll probably have to move over some of the older ones patrick_dengler: are you trying to close down SVG 1.1 2nd edition? ChrisL: yes, we want the official recommendation out now patrick_dengler: risk/benefit analysis... is it obvious that people should be reading the errata? patrick_dengler: as I look more deeply at the spec, we find more ambiguity... ... isn't this going to harm interop? ChrisL: we can continually work on new editions patrick_dengler: understood... we'd like to keep providing feedback ed: it may be easier to clarify wording in a new spec ChrisL: the implementation support on the wiki helps show interop ChrisL: shows interop and has links to the tests for the errata DS: Summary is that we should be focussing on SVG 2.0 and make clarifications to the 2.0 spec instead of keeping the SVG 1.1 2nd edition open DS: I guess we'll need new tests for the pointer-event/clip-path errata ed: we've made more progress on passing tests in Opera ChrisL: we have a couple of blanks in the impl report due to recently added tests, and it should be run on a mac DS: I can probably do that Topic: test suite patrick_dengler: the SVG test harness has a self-closing <object/>, which isn't allowed in HTML4/5 ChrisL: we can easily fix that ed: just checked the old testsuite harness, it's also using selfclosing object-tags action: anthony to update test harness to add closing </object> tag trackbot: Created ACTION-2715 - Update test harness to add closing </object> tag [on Anthony Grasso - due 2010-02-01]. Topic: xlink:href DS: I'm proposing we put this into spec form right away for implementers ed: I'm concerned about the implications for the DOM ChrisL: it's not just a case of syntax... ed: we'd still need to support xlink:href for back-compat ... getters and setters would be a challenge, not sure how much ... pretty easy to remap .href DS: which has precedence? ChrisL: author should use the same value for both if they use both @xlink:href and @src ed: easy to write a script or XSLT stylesheet to do that DS: should talk about what is done when document is reserialized DS: we should talk to tool vendors as well action: shepazu to contact Leonard Rosenthal about communicating with the Illustrator team trackbot: Created ACTION-2716 - Contact Leonard Rosenthal about communicating with the Illustrator team [on Doug Schepers - due 2010-02-01]. action: shepazu to write up spec text for xlink:href with Erik trackbot: Created ACTION-2717 - Write up spec text for xlink:href with Erik [on Doug Schepers - due 2010-02-01]. Topic: CSS Styling Attributes Level 1 spec ed: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2010JanMar/0023.html ed: I'd like to ask them about unitless values for properties defined by SVG patrick_dengler: I'm worried about what designers will expect ed: with styles in SVG-in-HTML, if quirksmode is on then units on css vals are not required i think patrick_dengler: are we going to ask them to loosen the rules about unit parsing? ed: I think so, at least for new SVG property values patrick_dengler: I'm just interested in interop patrick_dengler: there is a lot of content out there that doesn't have units ChrisL: that's one issue, but then there's also of the issue of properties where there are no units by design action: ChrisL to write wording about unitless property values for CSS Styling Attributes Level 1 spec trackbot: Created ACTION-2718 - Write wording about unitless property values for CSS Styling Attributes Level 1 spec [on Chris Lilley - due 2010-02-01]. Topic: transparency and pointer-events DS: opacity doesn't change pointer-events... not even the alpha channel of PNGs action: ed to make examples of transparent SVG+HTML with and without opacity trackbot: Created ACTION-2719 - Make examples of transparent SVG+HTML with and without opacity [on Erik Dahlström - due 2010-02-01].
Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2010 15:56:24 UTC