Re: fonts-elem-05-t

I looked into the actual test suite of SVG 1.2T, and it looks like
fonts-elem-05-t was just removed :-(

Am Donnerstag, den 29.04.2010, 16:28 +0200 schrieb Erik Dahlstrom:
> I agree, the test should be backported from 1.2T.
> 
> Cheers
> /Erik
> 
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 22:50:07 +0200, Dirk Schulze <vbs85@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> > I searched a little bit more in the mailing lists and found another
> > comment as well as an entry in the issue tracking system:
> >
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008AprJun/0160.html
> > http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2085
> >
> > I don't know if there are any results on this topic, but if so they
> > should be backported to the SVG 1.1 test suite.
> >
> > Dirk
> >
> >> the test fonts-elem-05-t surprised me a bit. The example tries to show
> >> the difference on various values for horiz-origin-x. But the expected
> >> result looks like no horiz-origin-x is applied at all.
> >>
> >> I searched in the mailing list and found following comment to this test
> >> (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008Mar/0080.html):
> >>
> >> "According to the spec the horiz-origin-x coordinate in
> >> the glyph space should be aligned with the current text
> >> position. If the x coordinate of the origin is increased,
> >> I'd expect the glyphs move left in the rendered results as
> >> the origin moves right in the glyph space. I'm assuming two
> >> things: 1) The x coordinate increases to right and 2) the
> >> horiz-origin-x is not added to the coordinates provided in
> >> the glyps."
> >>
> >> Sadly no one replied to this comment, but I'd agree to this opinion.
> >>
> >> Any thoughts on this?
> >>
> >> Greetings,
> >> Dirk
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:27:28 UTC