- From: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:28:07 +0200
- To: "Dirk Schulze" <vbs85@gmx.de>, "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
I agree, the test should be backported from 1.2T. Cheers /Erik On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 22:50:07 +0200, Dirk Schulze <vbs85@gmx.de> wrote: > I searched a little bit more in the mailing lists and found another > comment as well as an entry in the issue tracking system: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008AprJun/0160.html > http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2085 > > I don't know if there are any results on this topic, but if so they > should be backported to the SVG 1.1 test suite. > > Dirk > >> the test fonts-elem-05-t surprised me a bit. The example tries to show >> the difference on various values for horiz-origin-x. But the expected >> result looks like no horiz-origin-x is applied at all. >> >> I searched in the mailing list and found following comment to this test >> (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008Mar/0080.html): >> >> "According to the spec the horiz-origin-x coordinate in >> the glyph space should be aligned with the current text >> position. If the x coordinate of the origin is increased, >> I'd expect the glyphs move left in the rendered results as >> the origin moves right in the glyph space. I'm assuming two >> things: 1) The x coordinate increases to right and 2) the >> horiz-origin-x is not added to the coordinates provided in >> the glyps." >> >> Sadly no one replied to this comment, but I'd agree to this opinion. >> >> Any thoughts on this? >> >> Greetings, >> Dirk >> > > > -- Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2010 14:28:41 UTC