- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 17:48:07 -0500
- To: Helder Magalhães <helder.magalhaes@gmail.com>
- CC: SVG WG <www-svg@w3.org>
Hi, Helder- Thanks for your comments. Supplying a CVS patch is clever, but that's not really how we've traditionally take comments... I'll leave it up to the editor, but I would personally much rather see a simple corrected document that could be easily reviewed and copy/pasted if necessary. It is good to get such comments early, so it makes critical review at LC much less painful. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs Helder Magalhães wrote (on 11/29/09 12:11 PM): > > A few days ago I was taking a look at the vector effects primer [1] > and ended up catching a couple of typos. Today, I took at look at the > language [2] and requirements [3] and caught a few more, plus a bunch > of white-space corrections, minor coherency fixes and such. Yes, I'm > aware that the documents are at a draft status, but proposing > corrections/improvements is a Good thing, right? :-) > > A patch to the public CVS repository [4] is attached to this message. > I didn't double check for a specific procedure for providing this sort > of feedback but, given their relatively low relevance, a patch seemed > a perfect fit for the job. > > One thing that wasn't addressed was the fact that the requirements [3] > refer to the SVG filters specification. As that can become a source of > confusion, I'd suggest performing a quick "find and replace" followed > by a cleanup to the document: IMHO, a stub with a "TODO" note would be > better. ;-) > > > Hope this helps, > Helder > > > [1] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/modules/vectoreffects/master/SVGVectorEffectsPrimer.html > [2] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/modules/vectoreffects/master/SVGVectorEffects.html > [3] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/modules/vectoreffects/master/SVGVectorEffectsReqs.html > [4] http://www.w3.org/Project/CVSdoc/#Public
Received on Sunday, 29 November 2009 22:48:17 UTC