- From: Helder Magalhães <helder.magalhaes@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 17:11:21 +0000
- To: SVG WG <www-svg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <2a1ddf8a0911290911h50a6137fi1f8bcb92b6bddf6b@mail.gmail.com>
Hi everyone, A few days ago I was taking a look at the vector effects primer [1] and ended up catching a couple of typos. Today, I took at look at the language [2] and requirements [3] and caught a few more, plus a bunch of white-space corrections, minor coherency fixes and such. Yes, I'm aware that the documents are at a draft status, but proposing corrections/improvements is a Good thing, right? :-) A patch to the public CVS repository [4] is attached to this message. I didn't double check for a specific procedure for providing this sort of feedback but, given their relatively low relevance, a patch seemed a perfect fit for the job. One thing that wasn't addressed was the fact that the requirements [3] refer to the SVG filters specification. As that can become a source of confusion, I'd suggest performing a quick "find and replace" followed by a cleanup to the document: IMHO, a stub with a "TODO" note would be better. ;-) Hope this helps, Helder [1] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/modules/vectoreffects/master/SVGVectorEffectsPrimer.html [2] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/modules/vectoreffects/master/SVGVectorEffects.html [3] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/modules/vectoreffects/master/SVGVectorEffectsReqs.html [4] http://www.w3.org/Project/CVSdoc/#Public
Attachments
- application/octet-stream attachment: SVGVEMinorIssues.patch
Received on Sunday, 29 November 2009 17:12:09 UTC