- From: Helder Magalhães <helder.magalhaes@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:29:36 +0000
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Cc: SVG WG <www-svg@w3.org>
Hi Doug, > Supplying a CVS patch is clever, but that's not > really how we've traditionally take comments... I'd say CVS patches are much more appropriate for this sort of feedback (typos, whitespace and markup issues) than providing a long message full of snippets (as I recall doing during the SVG 1.2 Tiny LC). It would be great this was formally made a way to provide feedback, specially when no relevant text changes are involved; I do agree that, whenever significant prose changes are involved, providing text snippets is easier to both evaluate and discuss. :-) > I'll leave it up to the > editor, but I would personally much rather see a simple corrected document > that could be easily reviewed and copy/pasted if necessary. Yes, of course the editor has a final word on the subject. If you (or the editor, naturally) prefer that I attach the changed HTML files (I'm not sure if that's what you meant in the first place), of course I'm happy with it too: it just gets a little harder to tell the differences (downloading + performing a diff vs. directly taking a look at the patch), but the procedures are more or less equivalent. Regards, Helder
Received on Monday, 30 November 2009 14:30:35 UTC