- From: G. Wade Johnson <gwadej@anomaly.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 06:48:15 -0500
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Cc: Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, www-svg@w3.org, public-html@w3.org
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:48:42 +0100 Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote: > On Mar 17, 2009, at 16:20 , Jeff Schiller wrote: > > I'm just talking about somebody authoring: > > > > <html> > > <svg><circle cx=50 cy=50 fill=blue> > > </html> > > > > And some poor user viewing the source, copying that SVG fragment > > into another document and trying to bring it up in Inkscape... > > When that becomes a correctly processable SVG document, I'll be very > disappointed if Inkscape doesn't just parse the above. It's just an > extra parser library, the additional complexity is very low. Why would it? Unlike HTML, SVG is _defined_ to be XML and the above is not well-formed. That seems to be a large part of the disagreement. G. Wade -- If you like laws and sausages, you should never watch either one being made. -- Otto von Bismarck
Received on Wednesday, 18 March 2009 11:49:03 UTC